|
Mr. Chairman, thank you for calling this hearing today on
pharmaceuticals in the environment. I’m sure you would agree that
Americans enjoy one of the safest drinking water supplies in the world,
as well as reliable pharmaceutical drug supplies. Over the years,
science has helped answer many questions and provide remarkable cures
for common viruses to complex diseases. At the same time, science often
creates many new and challenging questions. It has moved us to a point
where we can now detect contaminants in our water all the way down to
the parts per trillion. Those emerging contaminants have caused the
public to rightly question, is our drinking water safe? I believe the
answer is yes, as we will hear in testimony today.
A few weeks ago, the Associated Press reported on emerging traces of
pharmaceuticals in several municipal drinking water systems, spurring
public concern and this hearing. Although, we should note that this is
not a new issue. In fact, this subject has been studied for nearly 40
years, even before the Safe Drinking Water Act was signed into law.
However, that doesn’t discount the public concern created over the media
report.
Mr. Chairman, I sent a letter to EPA requesting that they first
respond to the public, ensuring their health and safety is not
immediately at risk. I also asked that the Administrator convene an
advisory committee or working group comprised of all relevant federal
agencies, interested public and industry to review the emerging
scientific data and identify possible mitigation practices to reduce
overall disposal of pharmaceuticals. I appreciate EPA’s timely response
on both requests and am happy to know there is no immediate health risk.
I am also happy to hear that the administration is currently reviewing
cross jurisdictional guidelines to find a better way for drug disposal.
I look forward to hearing from our government panel.
We will also hear testimony today from Dr. Alan Goldhammer from
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA, who has
done extensive research on pharmaceuticals in the environment. PhRMA has
developed a watershed-based model to estimate concentrations of active
pharmaceutical ingredients discharged into surface waters through
everyday consumption of medicines. Through that base model, industry, in
cooperation with USGS, has further developed human health risk data on
26 active pharmaceutical ingredients. A significant amount of time and
money between the federal government and private industry has produced
favorable studies suggesting that the public is indeed safe. I
appreciate the time and effort by all in this area.
I’m also pleased to have Dr. Shane Snyder from Southern Nevada Water
Authority here to discuss his research on both the concerns that were
raised by the media, as well as whether current scientific findings
warrant expensive treatment mandates. Dr. Snyder has published several
manuscripts and book chapters on endocrine disrupters and
pharmaceuticals in water and we are happy to have him here today.
Before we get started, anytime we discuss issues surrounding drinking
water, I must take the opportunity to remind the committee that we need
to improve our nation’s drinking water facilities by reauthorizing the
States Revolving Loan Fund programs, both drinking and waste water. This
committee has the responsibility to ensure clean, safe, and affordable
water for our country by providing the necessary resources to our states
and local governments.
I hope this hearing provides clarity to the status of public health
and safety, while recognizing that current treatment facilities are
already under enormous compliance pressure.
Contact:
Marc Morano 202-224-5762
marc_morano@epw.senate.gov
Matt Dempsey 202-224-9797
matthew_dempsey@epw.senate.gov |